|
Post by Dominique Martin on Nov 10, 2016 3:24:18 GMT
I'm not sure how pertinent this is but often Caesar seems to be worrying about the food supply. Kind of like me(just kidding ). I don't know if this is a display of kindness but it definitely shows that he was smart leader. He knew that his men would fight best if they were in good health. I'm sure they also liked him more that he was feeding them. I feel like in a lot of military circumstances though they kind of put the health of the soldiers on the back burner, it's just, if we run out of food whatever, just keep fighting. Maybe not the best way to win a war. Caesar on the other hand, did the opposite, and I think that is a small part of his success.
|
|
|
Post by Christopher Martin on Nov 10, 2016 18:03:40 GMT
Wonderful analysis! As the saying goes, "an army marches on its stomach," and your analysis of Caesar definitely highlight's that he understood well the old military axiom. In fact, some military experts, both before and after Caesar, have gained renown merely on account of being able to keep an army together in the face of starvation (George Washington's winter at Valley Forge, for example).
I mention this in order to highlight the fact that this is an excellent point to have brought up: part of Caesar's genius was indeed to pay attention to the less glorious details of campaigning: making sure his troops were well fed. Heck, one could even argue that this ties into his charism: a well-fed soldier is far more likely to be loyal to his commander, right?
|
|